RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01281
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code LGH (Non-
retention on active duty) is inaccurate and unjust.
His Reentry (RE) code 2X (First-term, second-term or career
airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the
Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to allow him to
serve in the Air National Guard.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His SPD LGH defines his reason for discharge as a failure to
meet standards and based on his record of performance this code
is inaccurate and unjust.
His RE code 2X is inaccurate and unjust as he is currently a
fully qualified Aerospace Ground Equipment Craftsman with seven
years of experience.
In support of his request, he provides copies of his Enlisted
Evaluations Reports, Letters of Appreciation, and Character
Statements.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 21 Feb
06.
On 23 Feb 14, the applicant was furnished an Honorable
discharge, and was credited with 8 years and 3 days of active
service.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices
of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits
C and D.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of
an error or an injustice. The SPD code LGH means Non-
Retention on Active Duty. The applicant was not recommended by
his commander for retention, therefore, in accordance with the
DOS rollback program, he was separated. Based on the
documentation on file in the master personnel records, the
discharge to include the SPD code, narrative reason for
separation and character of service was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge
instruction and was with the discretion of the discharge
authority.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of
an error or an injustice. AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the
USAF, states commanders have reenlistment selective and non-
selective authority. The Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)
considers the members Enlisted Performance Reports (EPR)
ratings, Unfavorable Information from any substantiated source,
the airmans willingness to comply with Air Force standards
and/or the airmans ability (or lack of) to meet required
training and duty performance levels. On 9 Aug 13, the applicant
was non-selected for reenlistment. On 23 Sep 13, the applicant
acknowledged the denial of his appeal. The applicant was
discharged on 23 Feb 2013 under the FY12 Air Force - Force
Shaping Rollback Program.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 1 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days
(Exhibit E). As of this date, no response has been received by
this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary
responsibility (OPR) and adopt their rationale as the basis for
our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an
error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to
the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2014-01281 in Executive Session on 16 Dec 14 under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Mar 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Excerpt from Military Personnel Records
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 28 Apr 14.
Exhibit D. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 4 May 14.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Oct 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03463
He was notified the control roster action automatically placed him on the FY13 Rollback Program. He contacted the Separations office at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Randolph to correct this issue, but they were unable to manually change separation code on DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, because the automatic LGH separation code was loaded in their system. On 15 Jul 13, the applicant was separated under the FY13 DOS Rollback Program, with a RE code of 2X;...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00594
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00594 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code and his Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. On 11 Feb 13, the applicant was notified by his commander of his non-selection for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03717
His separation code of LBK (Expiration of Term of Service) be changed due to inconsistencies in his military personnel records. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicants military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 20 Jan 04. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicants request to change his separation code,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01220
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01220 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)) and separation program designator (SPD) code of JBK (expiration of term of service) be changed...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01746
On 1 Feb 13, according to an AF Form 416, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, the applicants supervisor recommended he be denied reenlistment. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00360
The Personnel Services Delivery Memorandum (PSDM) 13-14, FY13 Enlisted Date of Separation (DOS) Rollback Program, dated 13 Feb 13 states that members with less than 6 years of active service separated under the DOS Rollback program will be separated with SPD code JBK. Her AF IMT 100, Request and Authorization for Separation, Item 23, Remarks, reads SPD code JBK. The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. If any recoupment of unearned portions of...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02198
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02198 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code of JGH (non-retention on active duty) and his Reentry (RE) code of 2X (First-term, second-term, or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP))be changed so that he can enlist in the Air National Guard (ANG). The complete DPSOA...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04879
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04879 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code 2X (First-term, second-term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP)) be changed to a 1 series. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01988
Any duty that requires him to report his arrest for DUI violates his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. On 10 Oct 12, the applicants commander issued him an LOR for failing to report his arrest to his security officer as required by DoD Regulation 5200.2-R, paragraph C9.1.4. On 11 Mar 13, in response to a request from the applicant, his referral EPR was amended to remove reference to the DUI, however, the EPR remained an overall 3 based upon the applicants failure to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03451
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. In accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection authority. ...